Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: IAEP/NAGE Refuses Debate with NEMSA


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Date:
IAEP/NAGE Refuses Debate with NEMSA


All Concerned,


Official word from Lisa Lisard; NAGE/IAEP's Informational Director refused any sort of debate with NEMSA. Ms. Ross of Alameda County, CA. was informed just minutes ago that NAGE/IAEP will not debate any issue's with NEMSA. Ms. Ross was tasked with setting up and preparing the details of this debate. More on this breaking story as details become available.


All the IAEP supporters, I guess you can ask NAGE/IAEP why they backed out. Kind of hard to spin that huh guys? Why would NAGE/IAEP not want to debate with NEMSA? Maybe because they know that the rank and file would ask the tough questions! Like the illegal service agreement, etc.


Icemedic


Drink Ice water, it does a body good!



__________________
Icemedic


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 58
Date:

That is a surprise...



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Date:

Don't be fooled!!! The OFFICIAL word from IAEP/NEMSA Inc. (ASK ANY HIGH RANKNG PERSON) is that NEMSA Inc. wanted to announce the debate as NEMSA Inc. vs. SEIU/NAGE. Since EMS workers that are under the SEIU contract are now IAEP members (According to the LEGAL Service Agreement effective August 20th) IAEP would not be apart of more NEMSA Inc. propaganda. This is Torren chnaging the rules at the last second because he is scared and wants to stall until after the vote. As it stands, IAEP will show up, but if NEMSA Inc. insists on the SEIU/NAGE thing, it is over.


I think Icemedic is suffering from a brain freeze


 


~Driver



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 58
Date:

911 driver, you are obviously really, really, ill informed. Sorry, but you are not here. Here being in Alameda County.This was supposed to happen in Alameda County on Friday the 27th at 18:30. This was being arranged by the employees of Alameda County AMR and NOBODY ELSE. Ms. Ross is a paramedic who attempted to facilitate this debate.


Ms. Ross does not work for Nemsa, she works for AMR, she was being a host. The mediator, was a professional mediator, with no agenda towards either side. His bio as REQUESTED by Ms. Lisard was send to them for approval, the rules were standard rules, also known as the College Debate rules. IAEP wanted to change the rules the same way 250 wanted to change the debate rules. The only people not making this debate happen are IAEP. Now will you go study...



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:

IAEP - Local 250 - NAGE - SEIU - whoever - have backed down from a debate....now that is a surprise!


After all, Local 250 got a "clock cleaning" EVERYTIME they attempted a debate. (Question:What time is it 250? Answer: Time for a change!)


When you get into a battle of TRUTH and LOGIC, you don't want to come unarmed - which is exactly why they chickened out of a debate!


People - know this - NEMSA is an simply an organization of EMS workers, founded by field experianced, knowledgeable EMS labor representatives - who KNOW the myriad of problems with belonging to a large, affiliated union - who have SEEN the shortcomings of that organization - who have, because of their dedication to the profession, truly desire to see this Industry elevated to where it should be!


There is no conspiracy or secret here - EMS needs this! I have seen EMS ignored and superceded by other Divisions of Local 250 first hand! The IAEP is no different - they are still bound by rules of which YOU the EMS provider in the street, have NO SAY over!


Take control of your future! Your power is great and UNTAPPED! DON'T BE MISLEAD BY AN ORGANIZATION THAT JUST WANTS YOUR MONEY TO FUEL THEIR AGENDA!


Vote NEMSA Yes!!!


 



__________________
Vote NEMSA YES!!


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 95
Date:

  Easily led and unquestioning members of EMS.  Follow NEMSA down the untrod and dangerous path.  Dont bring a flashlight to search for the dangers (they have already scouted ahead).  Dont ask to see financial projections when NEMSA supporters claim that "some of us stand to make alot of money".  And most importantly, dont try to educate yourself about this vote.  Because the more info you have, and the more logic and reason you utilize, the glitter starts to fade and the uncertain and dangerous future becomes clear.  I think Flavor Flav and Chuck D said it best "Dont believe the HYPE!"

__________________
"It's time to awake, get up and fight, fight for mankind, live for a cause" The Pilfers


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 58
Date:

...and now flavor flav is in jail....



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 293
Date:

Torren,


So you refuse to debate because IAEP can't sign the signature statement as SEIU/NAGE as that would not be there true legal identity. They are IAEP. Well, we'll be there, you stay home with your bag of tricksies.



__________________
Take the Money and Run


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 58
Date:

Noooo, again Liza Lizard is the person who didn't want to adhere to the debate rules. Nemsa had already accepted the "challenge"on tuesday. IAEP had until 17:00 today to respond to the standard rules of College Debates, but failed to do so . So why don't you and your bag of trixies stay home... with a box of kleenex to dry your tears... 

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:

Helloooo...is this thing ON?

Please stop babbling and look over the post from Lisa Lessard on the other thread. IAEP will be there even if NEMSA is not.

Equus

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 293
Date:

All rules were agreed to.  NEMSA did not allow IAEP to be registered for the debate as IAEP.

__________________
Take the Money and Run


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 58
Date:

go play with your money. 

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:

your current facts are apperantly incorerect. NEMSA tried without luck, to estabilsh rules that would limit the fourm of the debate. this was a tactic that the IAEP did not go for because it would not enable the voting parties to ask any question that they would like to have answered.


THE DEBATE IS ON!


 


NICE TRY FOLKS



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 58
Date:

...and you were there of course...

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 293
Date:

The debate would have been so much more fun if NEMSA did not arrive.  I was waiting for the props to come out to fill in the gaps.  Oh well, we had to be stuck with the real thing and IAEP won the vote in the end. 

-- Edited by Play with My Money at 11:29, 2004-09-11

__________________
Take the Money and Run


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 343
Date:

Har-Har-Har


Yo-Ho-Ho and a bottle of Brass Monkey!


InYoFace B*tches!



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Date:

LOL!

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 226
Date:

ooooohhh this WAS a good one......

__________________
"I have given my word to Amy, Aultum that if they get over 75 signatures that I will with drawl my petition. " Carlos 10/6 "I will not pull the petition. " Carlos 10/10
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard